I recently bought On and I am quite satisfied with it's ability to control noise and sharpness in high ISO ORF files. But I do think they ultimately lead to false assessments of overall value. ![]() These things are fun to view and fun to make. The biggest problem with these types of articles is that they bog us down in minute differences when the truth is, all "AI" software of this sort is good enough for most people and most uses. That hasn't happened before the update ever and i eas just zooming in and out to compare the results. By the way LRC crashed my MacBook twice I mean completely nothing not even the mouse worked and then restarted by itself. So this was not a a picture with bad noise and i know that Topaz DeNoise AI does a really good jobeven with a lot of noise and i do use the Sharpen AI sometimes as well and works great. Speed wise i would say LRC DeNoise AI was a little faster, but not better in the end result. LRC doesn't give you much settings to change. So if i compare all three Topaz is still the winner because it not only removed noise but add sharpness to the picture and i can change settings if i don't like the results. Topaz DeNoise AI removed Noise and contained sharpness a touch better then LRC DeNoise AI. New LRC DeNoise AI removed Noise very welland fast, but still a little soft when zooming in. Denoise manual in LRC removed most of the noise, but made picture soft as well. ![]() noise wasn't to bad on the picture, but there was some. The picture i used foe now was shoot indoors with a Nikon D750 no flash ISO set to Auto -> 4500, tamron dx 18-400mm set to 35mm, f5.6 and speed to 1/320 sec (all manuel except iso). ![]() So I updated LRC just now to see how this new DeNoise Ai works. I have been using Topaz DeNoise AI and Topaz Sharpen AI about a year now and really like the results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |